Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Ryzen Embedded R2314
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Embedded R2314 outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1606G by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1445 | 1729 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 24.60 | 9.79 |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 21 June 2022 (2 years ago) | 25 February 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 26 |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 209.8 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 4,950 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP5 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 6 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.92 | 2.60 |
| Integrated graphics card | 3.04 | 2.98 |
| Recency | 21 June 2022 | 25 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R2314 has a 50.8% higher aggregate performance score, 2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen Embedded R2314 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded R1606G in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen Embedded R2314 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Embedded R1606G is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded R2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
