i5-10400F vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded R1606G
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.60
Core i5-10400F
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.20
+215%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1606G by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Core i5-10400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1732926
Place by popularitynot in top-1009
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.96
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Embeddedno data
Power efficiency9.8511.95
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date25 February 2020 (4 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$155

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Core i5-10400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.8 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Core i5-10400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Core i5-10400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Core i5-10400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Core i5-10400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Core i5-10400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Core i5-10400F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 2.60
i5-10400F 8.20
+215%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 4135
i5-10400F 13029
+215%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 317
i5-10400F 1332
+320%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 139
i5-10400F 180
+29.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 1903
i5-10400F 6365
+234%

Blender(-)

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 1456
+338%
i5-10400F 332

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 877
i5-10400F 1220
+39.1%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 3528
i5-10400F 5064
+43.5%

7-Zip

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 8969
i5-10400F 36731
+310%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 148
i5-10400F 215
+45.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 8.20
Recency 25 February 2020 30 April 2020
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Embedded R1606G has 160% lower power consumption.

i5-10400F, on the other hand, has a 215.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Core i5-10400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded R1606G in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Embedded R1606G is a notebook processor while Core i5-10400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Core i5-10400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1606G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 13771 vote

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded R1606G or Core i5-10400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.