EPYC 9745 vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.04
EPYC 9745
2024
128 cores / 256 threads, 400 Watt
94.08
+4512%

EPYC 9745 outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1600 by a whopping 4512% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19653
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.49
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency7.8022.49
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesTSMC
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date25 February 2020 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12,141

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded R1600 and EPYC 9745 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)128
Threads4256
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size209.8 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded R1600 and EPYC 9745 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1600 and EPYC 9745. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R1600 and EPYC 9745 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R1600 and EPYC 9745. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R1600 and EPYC 9745.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Embedded R1600 2.04
EPYC 9745 94.08
+4512%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded R1600 3276
EPYC 9745 150920
+4507%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.04 94.08
Recency 25 February 2020 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 128
Threads 4 256
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 400 Watt

Ryzen Embedded R1600 has 1500% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9745, on the other hand, has a 4511.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 6300% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 9745 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Embedded R1600 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9745 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600
Ryzen Embedded R1600
AMD EPYC 9745
EPYC 9745

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9745 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Embedded R1600 and EPYC 9745, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.