Pentium M 738 vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Embedded R1505G outperforms Pentium M 738 by a whopping 1746% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Pentium M 738 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1784 | 3340 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded | Pentium M |
Power efficiency | 9.09 | 1.23 |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
Release date | 25 February 2020 (4 years ago) | no data |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Pentium M 738 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
Multiplier | 24 | no data |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 209.8 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 4,950 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Pentium M 738 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FP5 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Pentium M 738. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Pentium M 738 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Pentium M 738. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Pentium M 738.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.40 | 0.13 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 10 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R1505G has a 1746.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium M 738, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen Embedded R1505G is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 738 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Pentium M 738, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.