Celeron N6211 vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Embedded R1505G outperforms Celeron N6211 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2158 | 2601 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.33 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded | Elkhart Lake |
| Power efficiency | 3.66 | 8.27 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Elkhart Lake (2022) |
| Release date | 25 February 2020 (6 years ago) | 17 July 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | $54 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Celeron N6211: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 24 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 209.8 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3,500 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FP5 | BGA1493 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and Celeron N6211.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
7-Zip Single
7-Zip
Blender(-)
Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core
WebXPRT 3
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.23 | 1.31 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.78 | 1.26 |
| Recency | 25 February 2020 | 17 July 2022 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R1505G has a 70% higher aggregate performance score, 121% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.
Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 317% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N6211 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Embedded R1505G is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
