EPYC 9755 vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded R1305G
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.91
EPYC 9755
2024
128 cores / 256 threads, 500 Watt
23.21
+1115%

EPYC 9755 outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1305G by a whopping 1115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2108267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.24
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Embeddedno data
Power efficiency18.424.48
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesTSMC
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date25 February 2020 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12,984

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded R1305G and EPYC 9755 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)128
Threads4256
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size209.8 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors4,950 million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded R1305G and EPYC 9755 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1305G and EPYC 9755. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R1305G and EPYC 9755 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R1305G and EPYC 9755. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R1305G and EPYC 9755.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G 1.91
EPYC 9755 23.21
+1115%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G 3073
EPYC 9755 37319
+1114%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 23.21
Recency 25 February 2020 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 128
Threads 4 256
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 500 Watt

Ryzen Embedded R1305G has 4900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9755, on the other hand, has a 1115.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 6300% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 9755 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Embedded R1305G is a notebook processor while EPYC 9755 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
AMD EPYC 9755
EPYC 9755

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1305G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate EPYC 9755 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Embedded R1305G and EPYC 9755, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.