5 210H vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Aggregate performance score
Core 5 210H outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1305G by a whopping 471% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Embedded R1305G and Core 5 210H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1987 | 728 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded | no data |
| Power efficiency | 18.20 | 23.08 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 25 February 2020 (4 years ago) | 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $342 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1305G and Core 5 210H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | 15 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 209.8 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded R1305G and Core 5 210H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP5 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1305G and Core 5 210H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Embedded R1305G and Core 5 210H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R1305G and Core 5 210H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R1305G and Core 5 210H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Iris Xe Graphics 48EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R1305G and Core 5 210H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.91 | 10.90 |
| Recency | 25 February 2020 | 18 December 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R1305G has 350% lower power consumption.
5 210H, on the other hand, has a 470.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Core 5 210H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded R1305G in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded R1305G and Core 5 210H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
