EPYC Embedded 9655P vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 171 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 25.29 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Gorgon Halo (2026) | Turin (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 20 May 2026 (less than a year ago) | 11 March 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9655P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 96 |
| Threads | 32 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm2 | 12x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 99,780 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP11 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9655P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 8065S | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC Embedded 9655P.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 May 2026 | 11 March 2025 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 96 |
| Threads | 32 | 192 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 400 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 627% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 9655P, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and AMD EPYC Embedded 9655P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 9655P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
