EPYC 7401 vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 outperforms EPYC 7401 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 171 | 192 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 25.29 | 7.86 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gorgon Halo (2026) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 20 May 2026 (less than a year ago) | 29 June 2017 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,850 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC 7401: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 20 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC 7401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FP11 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC 7401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC 7401 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC 7401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 170.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 8065S | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and EPYC 7401.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 33.60 | 32.29 |
| Recency | 20 May 2026 | 29 June 2017 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 24 |
| Threads | 32 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 170 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 209% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7401, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and AMD EPYC 7401.
Be aware that Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
