MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 1300T by a whopping 1819% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 161 | 2214 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mediatek |
| Power efficiency | 51.81 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | no data |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Strix Halo (2025) | Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 9 March 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP11 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 8060S | ARM Mali-G77 MP9 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
CrossMark Overall
WebXPRT 4 Overall
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 29.75 | 1.55 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 9 March 2022 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm |
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has a 1819.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
