Xeon Platinum 8353H vs Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 394 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Strix Halo (2025) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | no data | 6 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8353H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 24.75 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 14 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8353H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 8 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 MB + 32 MB | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8353H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8353H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8353H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8353H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8353H.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 18 |
| Threads | 16 | 36 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 150 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has 1775% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8353H, on the other hand, has 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8353H. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8353H is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
