Xeon Platinum 8170M vs Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 394 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Strix Halo (2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| Release date | no data | 25 April 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $10,409 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8170M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 26 (Hexacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 52 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | no data | 1.625 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 26 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 35.75 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 89 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8170M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 MB + 32 MB | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8170M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8170M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8170M are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8170M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.5 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Platinum 8170M.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 26 |
| Threads | 16 | 52 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 165 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has 1962.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8170M, on the other hand, has 225% more physical cores and 225% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8170M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8170M is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
