Xeon 638 vs Ryzen AI Max+ 388

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking412not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency13.91no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameStrix Halo (2025−2026)Granite Rapids (2024−2026)
Release dateno data2 February 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon 638 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data16
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data72 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno dataIntel 3 nm
Die sizeno data598 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
64 bit support-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon 638 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon 638. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon 638 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon 638 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon 638. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon 638.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has 227.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon 638, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Intel Xeon 638. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is a notebook processor while Xeon 638 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Intel Xeon 638
Xeon 638

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI Max 388 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 638 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon 638, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.