Turion 64 X2 TL-50 vs Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-50 by a whopping 5890% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 394 | 3364 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.01 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Strix Halo (2025) | Taylor (2006) |
| Release date | no data | 17 May 2006 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $154 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 147 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 154 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 MB + 32 MB | 512 KB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE(1,2,3), AMD64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.97 | 0.30 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 512 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has a 5890% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and 6300% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
