Ryzen Z2 Extreme vs Ryzen AI Max+ 388

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI Max+ 388
2026
8 cores / 16 threads, 55 Watt
19.47
+41.9%

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 outperforms Ryzen Z2 Extreme by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking428714
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Power efficiency14.6637.89
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameStrix Halo (2025−2026)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025)
Release date6 January 2026 (less than a year ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data640 KB
L2 cache8 MB8 MB
L3 cache32 MB16 MB
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP11FP8
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 19.47
+41.9%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 13.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 33331
+41.9%
Samples: 16
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 23496
Samples: 32

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 52968
+20.8%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 43834

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 6.9
+15.9%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 8

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 2872
+38.7%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 2070

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 298
+23.7%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 241

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 15.2
+44.8%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 10.5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.47 13.72
Integrated graphics card 43.36 19.38
Recency 6 January 2026 6 January 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has a 42% higher aggregate performance score, 124% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Ryzen Z2 Extreme, on the other hand, has 267% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Ryzen AI Max 388 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 72 votes

Rate Ryzen Z2 Extreme on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.