Atom N2600 vs Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 outperforms Atom N2600 by a whopping 9620% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 433 | 3629 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 14.62 | 2.07 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Strix Halo (2025−2026) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 6 January 2026 (less than a year ago) | 1 December 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $47 |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Atom N2600: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 66 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 176 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Atom N2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP11 | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 3.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Atom N2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Atom N2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Atom N2600 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Atom N2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2.44 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 8060S ( - 2900 MHz) | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.44 | 0.20 |
| Recency | 6 January 2026 | 1 December 2011 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 3 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has a 9620% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
Atom N2600, on the other hand, has 1733% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N2600 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
