Ryzen 7 8745HS vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025
12 cores / 24 threads, 55 Watt
24.49
+48.4%

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 outperforms Ryzen 7 8745HS by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking261459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency47.78no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameStrix Halo (2025)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and Ryzen 7 8745HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography4 nmno data
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and Ryzen 7 8745HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP11no data
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt8 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and Ryzen 7 8745HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and Ryzen 7 8745HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and Ryzen 7 8745HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 8050Sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and Ryzen 7 8745HS.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 24.49
+48.4%
Ryzen 7 8745HS 16.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 43207
+48.5%
Samples: 68
Ryzen 7 8745HS 29103
Samples: 773

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 8359
+16.8%
Ryzen 7 8745HS 7156

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 53551
+21.7%
Ryzen 7 8745HS 44005

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 6.67
Ryzen 7 8745HS 3.19
+109%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 3918
+74.5%
Ryzen 7 8745HS 2245

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 303
+17.2%
Ryzen 7 8745HS 259

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 10.7
Ryzen 7 8745HS 12.4
+15.4%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 174
+32.3%
Ryzen 7 8745HS 131

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 297
+14.2%
Ryzen 7 8745HS 260

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.49 16.50
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 8 Watt

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has a 48.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 7 8745HS, on the other hand, has 587.5% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS
Ryzen 7 8745HS

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 10 votes

Rate Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8745HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and Ryzen 7 8745HS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.