Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
20.58
+10%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
18.71

Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 outperforms M4 Pro (12 cores) by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking340385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M4
Power efficiency16.0924.69
DesignerAMDApple
Architecture codenameGorgon Pointno data
Release dateno data30 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and M4 Pro (12 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed2 GHz2.592 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.51 GHz
L2 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithographyno data3 nm
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and M4 Pro (12 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt32 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and M4 Pro (12 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 16-core GPU

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 20.58
+10%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) 18.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 36044
+10%
Samples: 3
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) 32775
Samples: 541

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.58 18.71
Threads 24 12
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 32 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), on the other hand, has 68.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores).

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 125 votes

Rate M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and M4 Pro (12 cores), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.