Xeon E5603 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.44
+1493%
Xeon E5603
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.22

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Xeon E5603 by a whopping 1493% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5603 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2882324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.19
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency34.071.44
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$286

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5603 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data239 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5603 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP8FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5603. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5603 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5603 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5603. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data288 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5603.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.44
+1493%
Xeon E5603 1.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 30886
+1496%
Xeon E5603 1935

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.44 1.22
Recency 25 July 2024 14 February 2011
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 80 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 1493.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 48.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5603 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5603 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5603, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Xeon E5603
Xeon E5603

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Xeon E5603, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.