Xeon E-2244G vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Xeon E-2244G by a whopping 261% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 232 | 1072 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 25.18 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) | Intel Xeon E |
| Power efficiency | 38.29 | 8.07 |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 25 July 2024 (less than a year ago) | 29 May 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $272 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 38 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 126 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP8 | FCLGA1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 71 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 890M | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
| Max video memory | no data | 128 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2160@24Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | no data | N/A |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.72 | 6.30 |
| Integrated graphics card | 20.72 | 6.39 |
| Recency | 25 July 2024 | 29 May 2019 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 71 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 260.6% higher aggregate performance score, 224.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 31.5% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2244G in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2244G is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E-2244G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
