Opteron 6276 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Opteron 6276 by a whopping 391% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Opteron 6276 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 304 | 1467 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.42 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 34.18 | 3.27 |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| Release date | July 2024 (recently) | 14 November 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $119 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Opteron 6276 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 233 mm2 | 316 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 2,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Opteron 6276 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 |
| Socket | FP8 | G34 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 115 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Opteron 6276. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Opteron 6276 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Opteron 6276. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Opteron 6276.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.44 | 3.96 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 16 |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 115 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 390.9% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 310.7% lower power consumption.
Opteron 6276, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores.
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6276 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Opteron 6276 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
