EPYC Embedded 3351 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC Embedded 3351 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 232 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 38.26 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 25 July 2024 (less than a year ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC Embedded 3351 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 19 |
| L1 cache | no data | 1152 KB |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC Embedded 3351 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP8 | AMD BGA SP4r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC Embedded 3351. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC Embedded 3351 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC Embedded 3351. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 890M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC Embedded 3351.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 July 2024 | 21 February 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 80 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 48.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC Embedded 3351. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3351 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC Embedded 3351, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
