E1 Micro-6200T vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68
+5079%
E1 Micro-6200T
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 3 Watt
0.38

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms E1 Micro-6200T by a whopping 5079% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2913031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)AMD E-Series
Power efficiency34.499.10
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Mullins (2014)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz1.4 GHz
L2 cache12 MB1024 KB
L3 cache24 MBno data
Chip lithography4 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP8FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt3.95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and E1 Micro-6200T.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68
+5079%
E1 Micro-6200T 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255
+5109%
E1 Micro-6200T 600

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.68 0.38
Recency 25 July 2024 29 April 2014
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 3 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 5078.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

E1 Micro-6200T, on the other hand, has 1700% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1 Micro-6200T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
AMD E1 Micro-6200T
E1 Micro-6200T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 29 votes

Rate E1 Micro-6200T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or E1 Micro-6200T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.