i7-9750HF vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.42
+185%
Core i7-9750HF
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
6.82

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Core i7-9750HF by a whopping 185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-9750HF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3021028
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency33.4014.08
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Coffee Lake-HR (2019)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-9750HF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache24 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-9750HF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-9750HF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-9750HF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-9750HF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-9750HF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-9750HF.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.42
+185%
i7-9750HF 6.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 30264
+185%
i7-9750HF 10625

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.42 6.82
Recency 25 July 2024 23 April 2019
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 184.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

i7-9750HF, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9750HF in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-9750HF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Core i7-9750HF
Core i7-9750HF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 64 votes

Rate Core i7-9750HF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Core i7-9750HF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.