i5-4200M vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.44
+998%
Core i5-4200M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.77

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Core i5-4200M by a whopping 998% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2882015
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)Intel Core i5
Power efficiency34.074.53
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)4 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache12 MB512 KB
L3 cache24 MB3 MB
Chip lithography4 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data130 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data960 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8FCPGA946
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890MIntel HD Graphics 4600
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.15 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data2880x1800@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12
OpenGLno data4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.44
+998%
i5-4200M 1.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 30886
+1001%
i5-4200M 2805

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 3334
+1023%
i5-4200M 297

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 301
+155%
i5-4200M 118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.44 1.77
Integrated graphics card 21.52 1.84
Recency 25 July 2024 4 June 2013
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 37 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 998.3% higher aggregate performance score, 1069.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

i5-4200M, on the other hand, has 45.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-4200M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i5-4200M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Core i5-4200M
Core i5-4200M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 449 votes

Rate Core i5-4200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Core i5-4200M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.