Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
22.72
+84.4%

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Core Ultra 7 258V by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking232639
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency38.2965.95
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)24 September 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890MArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 22.72
+84.4%
Ultra 7 258V 12.32

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 3334
+109%
Ultra 7 258V 1593

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 301
+11.5%
Ultra 7 258V 270

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.72 12.32
Recency 25 July 2024 24 September 2024
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 17 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 84.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 217.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 258V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.