Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.44
+1636%
Core 2 Quad Q8200
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.12

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8200 by a whopping 1636% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2882395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency34.071.12
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Quad Q8200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.33 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache24 MB0 KB
Chip lithography4 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data2x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data456 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Quad Q8200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Quad Q8200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Quad Q8200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Quad Q8200 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Quad Q8200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890Mno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.44
+1636%
Core 2 Quad Q8200 1.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 30886
+1640%
Core 2 Quad Q8200 1775

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.44 1.12
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 1635.7% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 75.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q8200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q8200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core 2 Quad Q8200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Quad Q8200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 541 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Core 2 Quad Q8200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.