Celeron M 560 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Place in the ranking	291	3078
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)	Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency	34.47	1.07
Architecture codename	Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)	Merom (2006−2008)
Release date	25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)	1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	12 (Dodeca-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	24	1
Base clock speed	2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	5.1 GHz	2.13 GHz
Bus rate	no data	533 MHz
L1 cache	no data	64 KB
L2 cache	12 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	24 MB	no data
Chip lithography	4 nm	65 nm
Die size	no data	143 mm²
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	no data	291 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	no data	-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	FP8	PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt	30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A	no data
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR5

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68
+5688%

Celeron M 560 0.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255
+5742%

Celeron M 560 535

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.68	0.34
Recency	25 July 2024	1 May 2008
Physical cores	12	1
Threads	24	1
Chip lithography	4 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt	30 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 5688.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 560, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 560 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.