Celeron G1820TE vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Celeron G1820TE by a whopping 3013% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G1820TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 298 | 2835 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 67.76 | 1.13 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | July 2024 (recently) | 1 December 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G1820TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 3 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 233 mm2 | 177 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G1820TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | 1150 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G1820TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G1820TE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G1820TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G1820TE.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.92 | 0.64 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 54 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 3012.5% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 92.9% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G1820TE in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Celeron G1820TE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
