Celeron 725C vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 725C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 305 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 34.18 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | July 2024 (recently) | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 725C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 1.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 233 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 725C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | Intel BGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 725C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 725C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 725C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 725C.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 1 |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 725C, on the other hand, has 64.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 725C. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
