Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 28 Watt
19.92
+39.6%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018, $649
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
14.27

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking341566
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.05
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency76.288.50
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameStrix Point (2024−2025)ZEN+ (2018−2019)
Release dateJuly 2024 (1 year ago)3 October 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2424
Base clock speed2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate54 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache80 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography4 nm12 nm
Die size233 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP8SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data93.867 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890M-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 19.92
+39.6%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 14.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 35112
+39.6%
Samples: 1999
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25148
Samples: 328

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 2591
+105%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1265

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 13320
+77.6%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 7500

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 8655
+60.1%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 5407

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 53766
+16.8%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 46015

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 2.74
+10.6%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 3.03

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 16380
+49.6%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 10948

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 3410
+29.7%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 2628

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 307
+72.5%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 178

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 15.3
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.2
+5.9%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 170
+29.6%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 131

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 306
+46.8%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 209

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.92 14.27
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a 39.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 546 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 85 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.