Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 28 Watt
19.87
+302%
Ryzen 5 2400G
2018, $169
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
4.94

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by a whopping 302% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3411394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.80
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency76.258.17
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameStrix Point (2024−2025)Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
Release dateJuly 2024 (1 year ago)8 January 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$169

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen 5 2400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate54 MHzno data
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache80 KB (per core)386 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size233 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen 5 2400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP8AM4
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen 5 2400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen 5 2400G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen 5 2400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890MAMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1250 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen 5 2400G.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 19.87
+302%
Ryzen 5 2400G 4.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 35104
+302%
Samples: 2035
Ryzen 5 2400G 8731
Samples: 3901

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 2591
+150%
Ryzen 5 2400G 1035

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 13322
+313%
Ryzen 5 2400G 3227

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 8655
+80.1%
Ryzen 5 2400G 4805

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 53766
+156%
Ryzen 5 2400G 21024

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 2.74
+152%
Ryzen 5 2400G 6.9

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 16380
+146%
Ryzen 5 2400G 6672

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 3410
+303%
Ryzen 5 2400G 847

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 307
+97.2%
Ryzen 5 2400G 156

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 15.3
+194%
Ryzen 5 2400G 5.2

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 170
+254%
Ryzen 5 2400G 48

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 306
+78.3%
Ryzen 5 2400G 172

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 14211
+266%
Ryzen 5 2400G 3885

7-Zip Single

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 6143
+57.2%
Ryzen 5 2400G 3909

7-Zip

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 80277
+304%
Ryzen 5 2400G 19885

Blender(-)

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 147
Ryzen 5 2400G 551
+274%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 2072
+107%
Ryzen 5 2400G 1001

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 293
+72.4%
Ryzen 5 2400G 170

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.87 4.94
Integrated graphics card 19.53 5.00
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a 302.2% higher aggregate performance score, 290.6% faster integrated GPU, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2400G is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Ryzen 5 2400G

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 549 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1651 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen 5 2400G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.