FX-4100 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 28 Watt
20.05
+1237%

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 outperforms FX-4100 by a whopping 1237% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3582389
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency30.210.67
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameStrix Point (2024−2025)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release dateJuly 2024 (1 year ago)12 October 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and FX-4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate54 MHzno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die size233 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and FX-4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP8AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and FX-4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and FX-4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and FX-4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and FX-4100.

PCIe version4.0n/a
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 20.05
+1237%
FX-4100 1.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 35084
+1234%
Samples: 2436
FX-4100 2629
Samples: 2458

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 2599
+553%
FX-4100 398

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 13368
+1237%
FX-4100 1000

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.05 1.50
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a 1236.7% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a notebook processor while FX-4100 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD FX-4100
FX-4100

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 584 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 989 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and FX-4100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.