Ultra 7 265K vs Ryzen AI 9 365

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 365
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
17.93
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.20
+107%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms Ryzen AI 9 365 by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 365 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34586
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data94.49
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency60.6428.18
Architecture codenameStrix Point (2024)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateJuly 2024 (recently)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 365 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads2020
Base clock speed2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 365 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP81851
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 365 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
SIPP-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 365 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 365 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 365 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 880MArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 365 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 365 17.93
Ultra 7 265K 37.20
+107%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 365 28483
Ultra 7 265K 59087
+107%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.93 37.20
Physical cores 10 20
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 365 has 346.4% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has a 107.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 365 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 365 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 365 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 42 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 82 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 365 or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.