Athlon XP 2600+ vs Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 outperforms Athlon XP 2600+ by a whopping 10550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 560 | 3628 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 22.49 | 0.09 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Gorgon Point (2026) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | no data | January 2001 (25 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $23 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and Athlon XP 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.92 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 101 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and Athlon XP 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 68 Watt |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.91 | 0.14 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 68 Watt |
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has a 10550% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and 142.9% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon XP 2600+ in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 2600+ is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
