EPYC 9965 vs Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9965 outperforms Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by a whopping 655% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 630 | 1 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 45.25 | 19.26 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $14,813 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC 9965 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 192 |
| Threads | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c | 384 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.25 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 54 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 233 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC 9965 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FP8 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 500 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC 9965. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC 9965 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC 9965. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 880M | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC 9965.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.25 | 100.00 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 192 |
| Threads | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c | 384 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 500 Watt |
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has an age advantage of 2 months, and 1685.7% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9965, on the other hand, has a 654.7% higher aggregate performance score, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 9965 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9965 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
