Opteron 8210 EE vs Ryzen AI 7 350
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 574 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 54.15 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Krackan Point (2025) | Santa Rosa (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 15 August 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 7 350 and Opteron 8210 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 195 mm2 | 235 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 7 350 and Opteron 8210 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FP8 | F |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Opteron 8210 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Opteron 8210 EE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Opteron 8210 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 860M | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Opteron 8210 EE.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 1.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 15 August 2006 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen AI 7 350 has an age advantage of 18 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 60.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and AMD Opteron 8210 EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 7 350 is a notebook processor while Opteron 8210 EE is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
