Celeron G6900E vs Ryzen AI 7 350
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 572 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 44.95 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Krackan Point (2025) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (recently) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon 860M | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron G6900E.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 46 Watt |
Ryzen AI 7 350 has an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 64.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 7 350 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
