A10-7860K vs Ryzen AI 7 350

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 7 350
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
13.19
+547%
A10-7860K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.04

Ryzen AI 7 350 outperforms A10-7860K by a whopping 547% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 7 350 and A10-7860K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5921957
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency44.752.98
Architecture codenameKrackan Point (2025)Godaveri (2014−2016)
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)2 February 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 7 350 and A10-7860K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache8 MBno data
Chip lithography4 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,411 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 7 350 and A10-7860K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP8FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and A10-7860K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and A10-7860K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and A10-7860K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5, LPDDR5XDDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon 860MAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen AI 7 350 and A10-7860K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and A10-7860K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and A10-7860K.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen AI 7 350 13.19
+547%
A10-7860K 2.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 7 350 21127
+546%
A10-7860K 3270

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.19 2.04
Recency 6 January 2025 2 February 2016
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen AI 7 350 has a 546.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7860K in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 7 350 is a notebook processor while A10-7860K is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Ryzen AI 7 350
AMD A10-7860K
A10-7860K

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Ryzen AI 7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 66 votes

Rate A10-7860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen AI 7 350 and A10-7860K, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.