3 304 vs Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 outperforms Core 3 304 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 834 | 1347 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 17.72 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Gorgon Point (2026) | Wildcat Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 5 January 2026 (less than a year ago) | 16 April 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $309 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Core 3 304: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 5 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 480 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Core 3 304 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | Intel BGA 1516 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Core 3 304. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Core 3 304 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Core 3 304 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Core 3 304. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 840M ( - 2800 MHz) | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Core 3 304.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.72 | 6.19 |
| Recency | 5 January 2026 | 16 April 2026 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 5 |
| Threads | 12 | 5 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a 89% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 140% more threads.
Core 3 304, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 87% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 3 304 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
