Xeon D-2796TE vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
30.11
+81.6%
Xeon D-2796TE
2022
20 cores / 40 threads, 118 Watt
16.58

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 outperforms Xeon D-2796TE by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon D-2796TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking140399
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.99
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency43.8413.30
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2024)Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)24 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,101

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon D-2796TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data20
Threads2440
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm10 nm
Die size2x 71 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °Cno data
Number of transistors13,140 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon D-2796TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt118 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon D-2796TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon D-2796TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon D-2796TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon D-2796TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon D-2796TE.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes2432
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 30.11
+81.6%
Xeon D-2796TE 16.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 47830
+81.6%
Xeon D-2796TE 26342

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.11 16.58
Recency 13 June 2023 24 February 2022
Physical cores 12 20
Threads 24 40
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 118 Watt

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 has a 81.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 81.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2796TE, on the other hand, has 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-2796TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon D-2796TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Intel Xeon D-2796TE
Xeon D-2796TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 23 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2796TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 or Xeon D-2796TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.