i3-2394M vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 227 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i3 |
| Power efficiency | 43.75 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2025) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $50 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Core i3-2394M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 26 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | 624 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Core i3-2394M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM5 | Socket G2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Core i3-2394M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Core i3-2394M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Core i3-2394M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Core i3-2394M.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.82 | 0.60 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 has 203.3% faster integrated GPU, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
i3-2394M, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Intel Core i3-2394M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-2394M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
