FX-9800P vs Ryzen 9 9955HX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 9955HX outperforms FX-9800P by a whopping 2173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 163 | 2405 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | 61.68 | 10.01 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 31 May 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 9955HX and FX-9800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 16,630 million | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 9955HX and FX-9800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FL1 | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 9955HX and FX-9800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 9955HX and FX-9800P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 9955HX and FX-9800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz) | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 9955HX and FX-9800P.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 31.59 | 1.39 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.76 | 1.80 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 31 May 2016 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 9 9955HX has a 2172.7% higher aggregate performance score, 53.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
FX-9800P, on the other hand, has 266.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-9800P in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
