EPYC 7D12 vs Ryzen 9 9950X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 9950X outperforms EPYC 7D12 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 101 | 268 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 68.82 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 23.54 | 30.25 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Rome (2020) |
| Release date | 15 August 2024 (1 year ago) | 14 April 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 9950X and EPYC 7D12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.7 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 32 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm2 | 4x 74 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,630 million | 15,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 9950X and EPYC 7D12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 9950X and EPYC 7D12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 9950X and EPYC 7D12 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 9950X and EPYC 7D12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 9950X and EPYC 7D12.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 37.33 | 23.98 |
| Recency | 15 August 2024 | 14 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 32 |
| Threads | 32 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 85 Watt |
Ryzen 9 9950X has a 55.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
EPYC 7D12, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 100% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 7D12 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 9 9950X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7D12 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
