Ryzen 7 7735U vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
40.36
+193%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by a whopping 193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 7 7735U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking61502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.49no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4)Rembrandt-U Refresh
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699no data
Current price$758 (1.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 7 7735U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed4.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz4.75 GHz
Bus support64K (per core)no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm6 nm
Die size2x 71 mm (CCD) sq. mm + 121 (I/O) mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °Cno data
Number of transistors13,140 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 7 7735U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FP7
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 7 7735U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 7 7735U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 7 7735U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)AMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 7 7735U.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes2420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 40.36
+193%
Ryzen 7 7735U 13.77

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 62424
+193%
Ryzen 7 7735U 21304

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 193% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2918
+62.7%
Ryzen 7 7735U 1793

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 63% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 19618
+153%
Ryzen 7 7735U 7752

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 153% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16551
+167%
Ryzen 7 7735U 6207

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 167% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 138015
+328%
Ryzen 7 7735U 32220

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 328% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 20279
+94.9%
Ryzen 7 7735U 10407

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 95% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2.01
+158%
Ryzen 7 7735U 5.18

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X3D by 158% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 65
+232%
Ryzen 7 7735U 19

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 232% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 5974
+252%
Ryzen 7 7735U 1698

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 252% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 326
+39.3%
Ryzen 7 7735U 234

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 39% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 3.86
+37.9%
Ryzen 7 7735U 2.8

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 38% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 26.9
+164%
Ryzen 7 7735U 10.2

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 164% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 15779
+222%
Ryzen 7 7735U 4904

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 222% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 266
+193%
Ryzen 7 7735U 91

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 193% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 393
+71.8%
Ryzen 7 7735U 229

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 72% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.36 13.77
Integrated graphics card 4.34 17.36
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 28 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7735U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7735U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 7 7735U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
Ryzen 7 7735U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1083 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 84 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7950X3D or Ryzen 7 7735U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.