Ultra 7 165H vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
39.35
+138%
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
16.50

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core Ultra 7 165H by a whopping 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core Ultra 7 165H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking68402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.78no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9Intel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency31.0155.73
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699$460

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core Ultra 7 165H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3222
Base clock speed4.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate64K (per core)no data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm7 nm
Die size2x 71 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature89 °C110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °Cno data
Number of transistors13,140 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core Ultra 7 165H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core Ultra 7 165H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core Ultra 7 165H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core Ultra 7 165H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core Ultra 7 165H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core Ultra 7 165H.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes248

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 39.35
+138%
Ultra 7 165H 16.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 62510
+138%
Ultra 7 165H 26214

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 5974
+126%
Ultra 7 165H 2641

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 326
+26.8%
Ultra 7 165H 257

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 24343
+102%
Ultra 7 165H 12052

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 86
Ultra 7 165H 246
+186%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2311
+28.9%
Ultra 7 165H 1794

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 8321
+57.8%
Ultra 7 165H 5273

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 159341
+180%
Ultra 7 165H 56997

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 383
+30.7%
Ultra 7 165H 293

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2193
+29.6%
Ultra 7 165H 1692

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 313
+19%
Ultra 7 165H 263

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 133
Ultra 7 165H 435
+227%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.35 16.50
Integrated graphics card 4.43 18.48
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Threads 32 22
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a 138.5% higher aggregate performance score, 45.5% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Ultra 7 165H, on the other hand, has 317.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 months, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 165H in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 165H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core Ultra 7 165H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1441 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7950X3D or Core Ultra 7 165H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.