Apple M4 Max (16 cores) vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
39.36
+40.7%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
27.97

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Apple M4 Max (16 cores) by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking67168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.74no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9Apple M4
Power efficiency31.0429.41
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)no data
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed4.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz4.51 GHz
Bus rate64K (per core)no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm3 nm
Die size2x 71 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °Cno data
Number of transistors13,140 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM5no data
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)Apple M4 40-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Apple M4 Max (16 cores).

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 39.36
+40.7%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) 27.97

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2193
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) 2255
+2.8%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 313
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) 353
+12.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.36 27.97
Recency 4 January 2023 30 October 2024
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 90 Watt

Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a 40.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Apple M4 Max (16 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Max (16 cores) in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a desktop processor while Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Apple M4 Max (16 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1416 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7950X3D or Apple M4 Max (16 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.