EPYC Embedded 2875 vs Ryzen 9 7950X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 121 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 8.83 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) | Grado (2025) |
| Release date | 27 September 2022 (3 years ago) | 9 December 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC Embedded 2875 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2 | 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13140 Million | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC Embedded 2875 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 75 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC Embedded 2875. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC Embedded 2875 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC Embedded 2875. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5200 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC Embedded 2875.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.07 | 1.83 |
| Recency | 27 September 2022 | 9 December 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 75 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7950X has 122.4% faster integrated GPU.
EPYC Embedded 2875, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 126.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and AMD EPYC Embedded 2875. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 2875 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
