Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 9 7940HX

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7940HX
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
34.02
+177%
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.30

Ryzen 9 7940HX outperforms Core Ultra 9 288V by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7940HX and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking113620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)no data
Power efficiency58.5438.80
Architecture codenameDragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7940HX and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache1 MB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors9900 Millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7940HX and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFL1Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 7940HX and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7940HX 34.02
+177%
Ultra 9 288V 12.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 7940HX 54040
+177%
Ultra 9 288V 19542

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.02 12.30
Recency 17 January 2024 24 September 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 30 Watt

Ryzen 9 7940HX has a 176.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 83.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 7940HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 288V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7940HX and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
Ryzen 9 7940HX
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 44 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7940HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 11 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7940HX or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.