Athlon 64 2850e vs Ryzen 9 7940HX
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 171 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 23.50 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 17 January 2024 (1 year ago) | August 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7940HX and Athlon 64 2850e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128K |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | 77 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | 122 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7940HX and Athlon 64 2850e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FL1 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 22 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Athlon 64 2850e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Athlon 64 2850e are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Athlon 64 2850e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Athlon 64 2850e.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 32 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 22 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7940HX has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 2850e, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and AMD Athlon 64 2850e. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 9 7940HX is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 2850e is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
